HotKey Website Content Management
HotKey Wedsite Content Management

Design by OceanMedia.net
Austin, Texas Banking
Legal Department

Capitol Comments
Comment Letters
Compliance Bulletins
Consumer Credit
Late Charges & Fees
Late Charges & Fees Interpretive Letter
360 Day Calendar Interpretive Letter
Home Equity
Home Equity Q&A
Home Equity LOC Q&A
Interpretive Letter
Finance Commission Resources
Legal Ease
Payroll Liens
White Papers
Year End Checklist

Forums / Message Board

IBAT
1700 Rio Grande Street
Suite 100
Austin, TX 78701
Phone: 512-474-6889
Toll Free: 800-749-4228
Fax: 512-322-9004

Contact IBAT

This page was modified on 11/14/2007
Tax Lien Finance Rules
 
November 14, 2007
 
VIA E-MAIL
Laurie Hobbs
Assistant General Counsel
Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner
2601 North Lamar Boulevard
Austin, Texas  78705
 
Re: 7 TAC Chapter 89.501 - 89.601
 
Dear Ms. Hobbs:
 
On behalf of the Independent Bankers Association of Texas (“IBAT”) I would like to make the following comments on proposed new 7 TAC Chapter 89.  These comments are directed to Subchapter F relating to costs and fees.
 
First, we would suggest that a loan origination fee is not a fee but rather is interest under Texas usury law.  Permitting a loan origination fee in the fee category could result in a transaction exceeding the maximum rate authorized in Section 32.06 Texas Tax Code for these transactions.  Therefore, we strongly urge you to delete loan origination fees from the category of permissible fees.
 
Next, we would suggest that you clarify that fees paid to third parties be limited to the actual charges of those third parties with no up-charge by the lender.  There are several reasons for this concern.  First, under 12 CFR § 226.4(a)(1)(ii) an up-charge of a third-party charge is a finance charge under the Truth in Lending Act rules.  Next, under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, it is a violation of § 8(b) for any person to accept a split of a fee where services are not performed by that person.  Thus, up-charging a third-party fee would arguably violate the anti-kickback rules of RESPA.  Admittedly, RESPA may not apply to all property tax lenders.  However, we believe that it will apply to some.  Finally, the up-charge may arguably constitute interest under a strict analysis of the Texas usury law.  Accordingly, the up-charge again could result in inadvertent violation of the interest rate cap specified in § 32.06 Texas Tax Code.
 
Thank you for this opportunity to comment.
 
Sincerely,
 
Karen M. Neeley
KMN:egw
 
CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Department of Treasury Circular 230, this correspondence is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used by the recipient, for the purposes of avoiding any federal tax penalty which may be asserted.
 
 

Home Advocacy Member Center IBAT Services Publications Store Learning Contact Us
Back to Top IBAT Privacy Policy IBAT Terms of Use Printable Version of this Page

web design by OceanMedia of Austin, Texas powered by HotKey hybrid