Page 23 - 630578_IBAT-Jan-Feb2018
P. 23

capital assets. Allocable wages means the shareholders’         Bonus Depreciation
             allocable percentage of total wages paid by the bank. In   The act allows taxpayers to expense 100 percent of the   COMMUNITY BANK
             other words, a 10 percent shareholder will be provided   cost  of  depreciable  assets  purchased  and  placed  into   EXPERIENCE
             a figure equal to 10 percent of the total wages paid by   service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1,
             the S corporation. Considering that most banks pay sig-  2023. This goes into effect immediately. The deduction
             nificant wages to officers and employees, we would not   percentage begins to phase down for property placed in     CORRESPONDENT
             expect for that limitation to cause many concerns.  service after January 1, 2023. Unlike the pre-act law, the      BANK EXPERTISE
                There are other limitations that apply to service-ori-  new legislation allows for full expensing of the cost of
             ented businesses such as physicians, attorneys, accoun-  an asset if it is the taxpayer’s first use, even if the origi-
             tants and other businesses where the most significant   nal use of the property did not begin with the taxpayer.
             asset is the expertise of the people. These should not be                                                              Fixed Income Securities Sales
             of concern to the bank itself, but may impact customers.          Tax Credit Bonds
                To compare the overall effective rate in comparison   Banks that have occasionally included the purchase of                      •
             to C corporations, at most a shareholder would pay 37   tax credit bonds in their investment portfolio will no        Bond Accounting & Safekeeping
             percent on 80 percent of the income leading to an ef-  longer have that option as the act repeals the ability to
             fective  rate  of  29.6  percent  on  the  ordinary  income.   issue tax credit bonds. Under the prior law, tax credit              •
             This 8.6 percent difference between maximum C and S   bonds were issued for projects where holders would get           Loan Hedging (ARC Program)
             corporations’ tax rates represents an increase from the   a tax credit in lieu of a portion of interest from the is-                •
             pre-act law, which yielded a spread of 4.6 percent (39.6   suer. No new tax credit bonds can be issued after De-
             percent versus 35 percent).                        cember 31, 2017. The prior rules will continue for bonds           Commercial & Industrial Credits
                                                                issued before this date.                                                         •
                             FDIC Premiums                                                                                              International Services
             Institutions  with  consolidated  assets  over  $10  billion   Itemized Deductions and Mortgage Interest
             will now be limited on the amount of FDIC premium   We expect a large number of married taxpayers who have                          •
             payments  that  may  be  deducted.  The  limitation  will   been itemizing deductions will now find it more advan-      Clearing/Cash Management
             phase out between $10 billion and $50 billion. Thus, in-  tageous to take the standard deduction, which has been                    •
             stitutions  with  consolidated  assets  more  than  $50  bil-  increased  to  $24,000  for  married-filing-jointly  status.
             lion cannot deduct FDIC premium payments.          This may have a subtle impact on lenders where the de-          Asset/Liability Management Reporting
                                                                cision to accelerate the principal payoff of the mortgage
                         Net Interest Expense                   becomes more attractive since certain taxpayers may no
             The act limits the deduction of interest expenses to the   longer receive a benefit in the form of a tax deduction   512.681.4452   800.848.8573
             sum of business interest income, 30 percent of the busi-  for mortgage interest payments. In addition, taxpayers
             ness’ adjusted taxable income and floor plan financing   initiating new home loans will be subject to different
             interest.  Net  interest  expense  is  defined  as  business   rules regarding mortgage interest deductions. The act
             interest in excess of interest income. Adjusted taxable   limits the mortgage interest deduction to $750,000 of
             income  for  purposes  of  this  provision  includes  earn-  new acquisition indebtedness. The $1 million limitation   111 Congress Avenue, Suite 400
             ings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortiza-  remains for older debt. The act puts a moratorium on              Austin, Texas 78701
             tion  (EBITDA).  Businesses  with  average  annual  gross   the deduction for interest on home equity indebtedness
             receipts of less than $25 million are excluded from this   for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.
             provision. Banks may see customers structuring trans-                                                                  www.csbcorrespondent.com
             actions differently by seeking additional equity invest-           S
             ment to avoid being subject to these limitations.                                                                               Visit Us
                                                                          onsider  this  as  a  brief  introduction  to  just
                             Moving Expense                               a  small  number  of  the  changes  in  the  act.
             The  act  eliminates  the  deduction  related  to  moving   While  some  of  the  revised  or  new  code  is
             expenses of an individual, whether paid for by the in-       rather  complex  and  lacking  in  guidance  or
             dividual  or  paid  by  employer.  Banks  that  pay  for  the Cinterpretation,  it  seems  evident  that  most
             relocation of an employee can no longer deduct that re-  profitable businesses should benefit dramatically from
             imbursement. The individual will not be able to deduct   the lower rates. It will be interesting to see the effect on
             unreimbursed expenses on their return either, so they   the economy and banking industry. H
             may be seeking relocation bonuses in lieu of the reim-
             bursement. This will increase the bank’s cost to relocate   Michelle Mullen is a tax principal at Briggs & Veselka Co., an
             an employee or new recruit.                        IBAT associate member based in Houston.

                                                                                                   MARCH–APRIL 2018 | 23
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28